Volume 15-1 Table of Contents

THE LEGAL DESTRUCTION OF UNIONS: A GLIMPSE INTO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S NEW “OPT-IN” REQUIREMENT FOR NONMEMBERS: KNOX V. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
Mary O’Rourke

A STRUGGLE FOR CLAIRVOYANCE—SECTION 101 OF THE PATENT ACT AS A GATEKEEPER TO PATENT ELIGIBILITY: MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERV. v. PROMETHEUS LABORATORIES, INC.
William J. Manolis

THE SUPREME COURT RULES THAT A SECURED LENDER MUST BE PERMITTED TO CREDIT BID IF ITS COLLATERAL IS SOLD PURSUANT TO A CHAPTER 11 PLAN: RADLAX GATEWAY HOTEL, LLC, ET AL. V. AMALGAMATED BANK.
J. Julius Bolock

SUPERIOR COURT HOLDS ACT 91 NOTICE PUBLISHED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA FINANCE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS DEFECTIVE. BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO. V. VUKMAN
Daniel Conlon-Gutierrez

Leave a Comment

Filed under Volume 15-1

Leave a Reply